Privacy Policy

Privacy Policy

Last updated: August 9, 2026

This Privacy Policy explains how Nigeria Case Law ("we," "us," or "the blog") collects, uses, and protects information when you visit our website.

Information We Collect

Information you provide directly. If you contact us by email, leave a comment, or subscribe to updates, we may collect the information you voluntarily provide (such as your name and email address).

Information collected automatically. Like most websites, we — and third-party services we use — may automatically collect certain information when you visit, including your IP address, browser type, device type, pages visited, and time spent on the site. This is typically gathered through cookies and similar tracking technologies.

Google AdSense and Third-Party Advertising

This blog is monetized in part through Google AdSense. As a result:

  • Google and its partners use cookies (including the DoubleClick cookie) to serve ads based on your prior visits to this website and other websites on the internet.
  • Google's use of advertising cookies enables it and its partners to serve ads to you based on your visit to this site and/or other sites.
  • You may opt out of personalized advertising by visiting Google's Ads Settings. You can also opt out of a third-party vendor's use of cookies for personalized advertising by visiting www.aboutads.info.
  • Third-party vendors, including Google, may use cookies to serve ads based on your past visits to this site.

We do not control the cookies placed by Google or other third-party advertising partners, and this Privacy Policy does not extend to their practices. We encourage you to review Google's own Privacy Policy at policies.google.com/privacy for further information.

Analytics

We may use analytics tools (such as Google Analytics) to understand how visitors use this site. These tools collect information anonymously and report website trends without identifying individual visitors.

How We Use Information

Any information collected is used to:

  • Operate, maintain, and improve this blog
  • Respond to inquiries or comments
  • Understand how our content is being used, so we can improve it
  • Serve relevant advertising through Google AdSense and similar services

We do not sell your personal information to third parties.

Cookies

Cookies are small text files stored on your device. You can set your browser to refuse cookies or alert you when cookies are being sent. Note that some parts of the site may not function properly if you disable cookies.

Privacy of Minors (Digital Consent)

This blog is not directed to individuals under the age of 18 (or the relevant age of consent in your jurisdiction). We do not knowingly collect, process, or solicit personal data from children.

In accordance with Section 31 of the Nigeria Data Protection Act (NDPA), the relevant age of digital consent in Nigeria is 18 years. If you are under the age of 18, you must obtain explicit and verifiable consent from your parent or legal guardian before providing any personal data through this platform.

If we discover or are notified that we have inadvertently collected personal data from a minor under 18 without verifiable parental consent, we will take immediate steps to delete that information from our servers and terminate any associated interactions.

If you are a parent or legal guardian and believe that your child has provided personal data to us without your consent, please contact us immediately at nigeriacaselaw@gmail.com.

Your Rights

Depending on your location, you may have rights regarding your personal data, including the right to access, correct, or request deletion of information we hold about you. To make such a request, contact us at nigeriacaselaw@gmail.com.

Changes to This Policy

We may update this Privacy Policy from time to time. Changes will be posted on this page with an updated "Last updated" date.

Contact Us

If you have questions about this Privacy Policy, please contact us at nigeriacaselaw@gmail.com.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tenant at Will or Yearly Tenant? Lessons from the case of Odutola v. Papersack (Nig.) Ltd [2006] 18 NWLR (SC)

Tenant at Will or Yearly Tenant? What a Landlord-Tenant Dispute Teaches Us About Proving Oral Agreements Case : Odutola v. Papersack (Nig.) Ltd [2006] 18 NWLR (SC) Court : Supreme Court of Nigeria If you've ever relied on a verbal understanding instead of getting it in writing, this case is a cautionary tale. It's a dispute over a warehouse in Lagos that turned entirely on one question: can you prove a tenancy existed just by saying so — or does the law demand more? The Property at the Centre of It All The dispute concerned premises at 44, Eric Moore Road, Iganmu Industrial Estate, Lagos. The first appellant owned the property outright and was also the founder, majority shareholder, and Managing Director of the second appellant, a company that had taken over the unexpired interest in the property from December 1991. According to the appellants, the original tenant of the property was a different company entirely — Thoresen and Co. (Nig.) Ltd — whose tenancy expired in 19...
Read more

Notice of Appeal, Cross-Appeals, and the Limits of Technical Objections: The Procedural Holdings in Tourist Co. v. Neo-Vista Properties

Notice of Appeal, Cross-Appeals, and the Limits of Technical Objections: The Procedural Holdings in Tourist Co. v. Neo-Vista Properties Case: Tourist Co. (Nig.) Ltd. v. Neo-Vista Properties Ltd. [2022] 15 NWLR 317 (SC) Court: Supreme Court of Nigeria This is a companion piece to our earlier post on the substantive land dispute in this case. That post covered the merits — competing grants, revocations, and an abandoned counter-claim. This one is for the practitioners: a closer look at the roughly two dozen procedural holdings the Supreme Court worked through before ever reaching the substance, most of them centred on a single respondent's attempt to knock the appeal out entirely on a notice-of-appeal technicality. The Objection That Triggered All of This The respondent's central procedural argument was straightforward on its face: the appellant's notice of appeal, filed both at the Court of Appeal and later at the Supreme Court, didn't list the names of every party wh...
Read more

When Is There Enough Evidence to Convict for Murder? Lessons from Rabi Haruna v. State.

  When Is There Enough Evidence to Convict for Murder? Lessons from Rabi Haruna v. State Case: Rabi Haruna v. State [ 2022 ] 16 NWLR 1 (SC) Court: Supreme Court of Nigeria. Can someone be convicted of murder without a post-mortem report? Without the murder weapon ever being recovered? Without a single eyewitness to the actual killing? These questions sat at the heart of a case that travelled from a Magistrate Court in Kaduna all the way to the Supreme Court of Nigeria — and the answers the apex court gave are worth understanding, whether you're a law student, a litigator, or simply curious about how criminal evidence really works in practice. How It All Began The story starts with the death of a man named Musa Bello, who was struck twice on the head with a pestle while he lay asleep in his room. He was rushed to hospital but did not survive. The person accused of the attack, Rabi Haruna, was first brought before a Magistrate Court — but because the charge she potentially f...
Read more